TSTP Solution File: ALG278^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : ALG278^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 04:13:45 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 25
% Number of leaves : 17
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 67 ( 49 unt; 10 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 211 ( 101 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 461 ( 11 ~; 0 |; 19 &; 378 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 78 ( 78 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 13 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% ( 38 !!; 9 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 159 ( 95 ^ 54 !; 10 ?; 159 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
g: $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
g: $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
cGROUP2: ( g > g > g ) > g > $o ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
cGRP_ASSOC: ( g > g > g ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE: ( g > g > g ) > g > $o ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
cGRP_LEFT_UNIT: ( g > g > g ) > g > $o ).
thf(func_def_17,type,
sK0: g > g > g ).
thf(func_def_18,type,
sK1: g ).
thf(func_def_19,type,
sK2: g ).
thf(func_def_21,type,
sK4: g > g ).
thf(f118,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f117]) ).
thf(f117,plain,
sK2 != sK2,
inference(superposition,[],[f26,f103]) ).
thf(f103,plain,
! [X0: g] :
( ( sK0 @ X0 @ sK1 )
= X0 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f57,f95]) ).
thf(f95,plain,
! [X0: g] :
( ( sK4 @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) )
= X0 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f57,f90]) ).
thf(f90,plain,
! [X0: g] :
( ( sK0 @ ( sK4 @ ( sK4 @ ( sK4 @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) ) ) ) @ sK1 )
= X0 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f55,f66]) ).
thf(f66,plain,
! [X0: g] :
( sK1
= ( sK0 @ ( sK4 @ ( sK4 @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) ) ) @ X0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f55,f57]) ).
thf(f55,plain,
! [X0: g,X1: g] :
( ( sK0 @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) @ ( sK0 @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= X1 ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f51,f42]) ).
thf(f42,plain,
! [X1: g] :
( ( sK0 @ sK1 @ X1 )
= X1 ),
inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f41]) ).
thf(f41,plain,
! [X1: g] :
( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 @ X1 )
= X1 )
= $true ),
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f40]) ).
thf(f40,plain,
! [X1: g] :
( ( ^ [Y0: g] :
( ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y0 )
= Y0 )
@ X1 )
= $true ),
inference(pi_clausification,[],[f33]) ).
thf(f33,plain,
( ( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y0: g] :
( ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y0 )
= Y0 ) )
= $true ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f32]) ).
thf(f32,plain,
( ( ( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y0: g] :
( ?? @ g
@ ^ [Y1: g] :
( ( sK0 @ Y1 @ Y0 )
= sK1 ) ) )
& ( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y0: g] :
( ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y0 )
= Y0 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f30]) ).
thf(f30,plain,
( ( ( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y0: g] :
( ?? @ g
@ ^ [Y1: g] :
( ( sK0 @ Y1 @ Y0 )
= sK1 ) ) )
& ( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y0: g] :
( ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y0 )
= Y0 ) )
& ( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y0: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y1: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y2: g] :
( ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ Y1 @ Y0 ) @ Y2 )
= ( sK0 @ Y1 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f29]) ).
thf(f29,plain,
( ( ^ [Y0: g > g > g,Y1: g] :
( ( ^ [Y2: g > g > g,Y3: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y4: g] :
( ?? @ g
@ ^ [Y5: g] :
( ( Y2 @ Y5 @ Y4 )
= Y3 ) ) )
@ Y0
@ Y1 )
& ( ^ [Y2: g > g > g,Y3: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y4: g] :
( ( Y2 @ Y3 @ Y4 )
= Y4 ) )
@ Y0
@ Y1 )
& ( ^ [Y2: g > g > g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y3: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y4: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y5: g] :
( ( Y2 @ ( Y2 @ Y4 @ Y3 ) @ Y5 )
= ( Y2 @ Y4 @ ( Y2 @ Y3 @ Y5 ) ) ) ) ) )
@ Y0 ) )
@ sK0
@ sK1 )
= $true ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f27,f28]) ).
thf(f28,plain,
( cGROUP2
= ( ^ [Y0: g > g > g,Y1: g] :
( ( ^ [Y2: g > g > g,Y3: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y4: g] :
( ?? @ g
@ ^ [Y5: g] :
( ( Y2 @ Y5 @ Y4 )
= Y3 ) ) )
@ Y0
@ Y1 )
& ( ^ [Y2: g > g > g,Y3: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y4: g] :
( ( Y2 @ Y3 @ Y4 )
= Y4 ) )
@ Y0
@ Y1 )
& ( ^ [Y2: g > g > g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y3: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y4: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y5: g] :
( ( Y2 @ ( Y2 @ Y4 @ Y3 ) @ Y5 )
= ( Y2 @ Y4 @ ( Y2 @ Y3 @ Y5 ) ) ) ) ) )
@ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f23,f22,f25,f24]) ).
thf(f24,plain,
( cGRP_ASSOC
= ( ^ [Y0: g > g > g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y1: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y2: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y3: g] :
( ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) @ Y3 )
= ( Y0 @ Y2 @ ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
thf(f11,plain,
( cGRP_ASSOC
= ( ^ [Y0: g > g > g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y1: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y2: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y3: g] :
( ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) @ Y3 )
= ( Y0 @ Y2 @ ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f10]) ).
thf(f10,plain,
( ( ^ [X0: g > g > g] :
! [X1: g,X2: g,X3: g] :
( ( X0 @ ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 ) @ X1 )
= ( X0 @ X2 @ ( X0 @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ) )
= cGRP_ASSOC ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,axiom,
( ( ^ [X0: g > g > g] :
! [X3: g,X1: g,X2: g] :
( ( X0 @ ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X3 )
= ( X0 @ X1 @ ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) )
= cGRP_ASSOC ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1FqtWFNwz3/Vampire---4.8_32556',cGRP_ASSOC_def) ).
thf(f25,plain,
( cGRP_LEFT_UNIT
= ( ^ [Y0: g > g > g,Y1: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y2: g] :
( ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 )
= Y2 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
( cGRP_LEFT_UNIT
= ( ^ [Y0: g > g > g,Y1: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y2: g] :
( ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 )
= Y2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
( ( ^ [X0: g > g > g,X1: g] :
! [X2: g] :
( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
= X2 ) )
= cGRP_LEFT_UNIT ),
inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).
thf(f3,axiom,
( ( ^ [X0: g > g > g,X4: g] :
! [X1: g] :
( ( X0 @ X4 @ X1 )
= X1 ) )
= cGRP_LEFT_UNIT ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1FqtWFNwz3/Vampire---4.8_32556',cGRP_LEFT_UNIT_def) ).
thf(f22,plain,
( cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE
= ( ^ [Y0: g > g > g,Y1: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y2: g] :
( ?? @ g
@ ^ [Y3: g] :
( ( Y0 @ Y3 @ Y2 )
= Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
thf(f15,plain,
( cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE
= ( ^ [Y0: g > g > g,Y1: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y2: g] :
( ?? @ g
@ ^ [Y3: g] :
( ( Y0 @ Y3 @ Y2 )
= Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f14]) ).
thf(f14,plain,
( ( ^ [X0: g > g > g,X1: g] :
! [X2: g] :
? [X3: g] :
( ( X0 @ X3 @ X2 )
= X1 ) )
= cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f2,axiom,
( ( ^ [X0: g > g > g,X4: g] :
! [X1: g] :
? [X2: g] :
( ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 )
= X4 ) )
= cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1FqtWFNwz3/Vampire---4.8_32556',cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE_def) ).
thf(f23,plain,
( cGROUP2
= ( ^ [Y0: g > g > g,Y1: g] :
( ( cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE @ Y0 @ Y1 )
& ( cGRP_LEFT_UNIT @ Y0 @ Y1 )
& ( cGRP_ASSOC @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).
thf(f17,plain,
( cGROUP2
= ( ^ [Y0: g > g > g,Y1: g] :
( ( cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE @ Y0 @ Y1 )
& ( cGRP_LEFT_UNIT @ Y0 @ Y1 )
& ( cGRP_ASSOC @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f16]) ).
thf(f16,plain,
( cGROUP2
= ( ^ [X0: g > g > g,X1: g] :
( ( cGRP_ASSOC @ X0 )
& ( cGRP_LEFT_UNIT @ X0 @ X1 )
& ( cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,axiom,
( cGROUP2
= ( ^ [X0: g > g > g,X4: g] :
( ( cGRP_ASSOC @ X0 )
& ( cGRP_LEFT_UNIT @ X0 @ X4 )
& ( cGRP_LEFT_INVERSE @ X0 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1FqtWFNwz3/Vampire---4.8_32556',cGROUP2_def) ).
thf(f27,plain,
( ( cGROUP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).
thf(f21,plain,
( ( ( cGROUP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 )
= $true )
& ( ( sK0 @ sK2 @ sK1 )
!= sK2 ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f18,f20,f19]) ).
thf(f19,plain,
( ? [X0: g > g > g,X1: g] :
( ( ( cGROUP2 @ X0 @ X1 )
= $true )
& ? [X2: g] :
( ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 )
!= X2 ) )
=> ( ( ( cGROUP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 )
= $true )
& ? [X2: g] :
( ( sK0 @ X2 @ sK1 )
!= X2 ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
thf(f20,plain,
( ? [X2: g] :
( ( sK0 @ X2 @ sK1 )
!= X2 )
=> ( ( sK0 @ sK2 @ sK1 )
!= sK2 ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
thf(f18,plain,
? [X0: g > g > g,X1: g] :
( ( ( cGROUP2 @ X0 @ X1 )
= $true )
& ? [X2: g] :
( ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 )
!= X2 ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
~ ! [X0: g > g > g,X1: g] :
( ( ( cGROUP2 @ X0 @ X1 )
= $true )
=> ! [X2: g] :
( ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 )
= X2 ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f8]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
~ ! [X0: g > g > g,X1: g] :
( ( cGROUP2 @ X0 @ X1 )
=> ! [X2: g] :
( ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 )
= X2 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0: g > g > g,X4: g] :
( ( cGROUP2 @ X0 @ X4 )
=> ! [X1: g] :
( ( X0 @ X1 @ X4 )
= X1 ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f5]) ).
thf(f5,conjecture,
! [X0: g > g > g,X4: g] :
( ( cGROUP2 @ X0 @ X4 )
=> ! [X1: g] :
( ( X0 @ X1 @ X4 )
= X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1FqtWFNwz3/Vampire---4.8_32556',cE12A1) ).
thf(f51,plain,
! [X0: g,X1: g] :
( ( sK0 @ sK1 @ X1 )
= ( sK0 @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) @ ( sK0 @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f49,f39]) ).
thf(f39,plain,
! [X1: g] :
( sK1
= ( sK0 @ ( sK4 @ X1 ) @ X1 ) ),
inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f38]) ).
thf(f38,plain,
! [X1: g] :
( ( ( sK0 @ ( sK4 @ X1 ) @ X1 )
= sK1 )
= $true ),
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f37]) ).
thf(f37,plain,
! [X1: g] :
( ( ^ [Y0: g] :
( ( sK0 @ Y0 @ X1 )
= sK1 )
@ ( sK4 @ X1 ) )
= $true ),
inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f36]) ).
thf(f36,plain,
! [X1: g] :
( ( ?? @ g
@ ^ [Y0: g] :
( ( sK0 @ Y0 @ X1 )
= sK1 ) )
= $true ),
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f35]) ).
thf(f35,plain,
! [X1: g] :
( ( ^ [Y0: g] :
( ?? @ g
@ ^ [Y1: g] :
( ( sK0 @ Y1 @ Y0 )
= sK1 ) )
@ X1 )
= $true ),
inference(pi_clausification,[],[f34]) ).
thf(f34,plain,
( ( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y0: g] :
( ?? @ g
@ ^ [Y1: g] :
( ( sK0 @ Y1 @ Y0 )
= sK1 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f32]) ).
thf(f49,plain,
! [X2: g,X3: g,X1: g] :
( ( sK0 @ X2 @ ( sK0 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
= ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ X2 @ X1 ) @ X3 ) ),
inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f48]) ).
thf(f48,plain,
! [X2: g,X3: g,X1: g] :
( ( ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ X2 @ X1 ) @ X3 )
= ( sK0 @ X2 @ ( sK0 @ X1 @ X3 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f47]) ).
thf(f47,plain,
! [X2: g,X3: g,X1: g] :
( ( ^ [Y0: g] :
( ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ X2 @ X1 ) @ Y0 )
= ( sK0 @ X2 @ ( sK0 @ X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
@ X3 )
= $true ),
inference(pi_clausification,[],[f46]) ).
thf(f46,plain,
! [X2: g,X1: g] :
( ( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y0: g] :
( ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ X2 @ X1 ) @ Y0 )
= ( sK0 @ X2 @ ( sK0 @ X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f45]) ).
thf(f45,plain,
! [X2: g,X1: g] :
( ( ^ [Y0: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y1: g] :
( ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 @ X1 ) @ Y1 )
= ( sK0 @ Y0 @ ( sK0 @ X1 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
@ X2 )
= $true ),
inference(pi_clausification,[],[f44]) ).
thf(f44,plain,
! [X1: g] :
( ( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y0: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y1: g] :
( ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 @ X1 ) @ Y1 )
= ( sK0 @ Y0 @ ( sK0 @ X1 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f43]) ).
thf(f43,plain,
! [X1: g] :
( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y1: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y2: g] :
( ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ Y1 @ Y0 ) @ Y2 )
= ( sK0 @ Y1 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) )
@ X1 ) ),
inference(pi_clausification,[],[f31]) ).
thf(f31,plain,
( ( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y0: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y1: g] :
( !! @ g
@ ^ [Y2: g] :
( ( sK0 @ ( sK0 @ Y1 @ Y0 ) @ Y2 )
= ( sK0 @ Y1 @ ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f30]) ).
thf(f57,plain,
! [X0: g] :
( ( sK0 @ ( sK4 @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) ) @ sK1 )
= X0 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f55,f39]) ).
thf(f26,plain,
( ( sK0 @ sK2 @ sK1 )
!= sK2 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : ALG278^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Fri May 3 20:01:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.37 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.37 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1FqtWFNwz3/Vampire---4.8_32556
% 0.15/0.39 % (32729)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32732)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32731)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32733)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32734)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32732)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39 % (32732)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32732)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32732)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39 % (32732)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (32732)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.15/0.39 % (32732)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (32732)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32732)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32732)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32731)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39 % (32731)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32731)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32731)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39 % (32731)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (32731)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39 % (32731)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (32731)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32731)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32731)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32733)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.39 % (32733)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32733)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32733)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (32733)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39 % (32733)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (32733)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32733)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32733)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32728)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32735)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32729)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39 % (32729)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32729)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32729)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39 % (32729)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (32729)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39 % (32729)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (32729)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32729)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32729)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32735)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.39 % (32735)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32735)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32735)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.39 % (32735)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (32735)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.39 % (32735)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (32735)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (32735)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (32735)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 % (32730)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (32734)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.40 % (32734)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.40 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.15/0.40 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.40 % (32734)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 % (32734)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.40 % (32734)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 % (32734)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.15/0.40 % (32734)Time elapsed: 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.40 % (32734)Instructions burned: 16 (million)
% 0.15/0.40 % (32734)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 % (32734)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 % (32727)Success in time 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.40 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------